CIPP/US Study Guide
Chapter 14: The GDPR and International Privacy Issues

EU-U.S. Transfers: Schrems I, Schrems II, and the Data Privacy Framework

The CJEU struck down Safe Harbor (Schrems I, 2015) and Privacy Shield (Schrems II, 2020) over U.S. surveillance concerns. The EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (2023), backed by Executive Order 14086, is the third agreement and is expected to be challenged.

Two earlier agreements - U.S.-EU Safe Harbor and the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield - were put in place and struck down by the CJEU. In Schrems I (2015), the CJEU struck down Safe Harbor, driven by concerns about U.S. surveillance highlighted by the 2013 Snowden disclosures.

In Schrems II (2020), the CJEU struck down the Privacy Shield, again citing a perceived lack of protection from U.S. government surveillance and a lack of individual redress and proportionality. Importantly, Schrems II applies generally to all third countries - implicating countries like China that offer fewer protections than the United States.

The third agreement

In July 2023 the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework was finalized. Via Executive Order 14086, the U.S. agreed that surveillance would meet a necessity and proportionality standard and established an independent data protection review court for EU citizens. The U.S. designated the EU and member states as qualifying states, and the European Commission then issued its U.S. adequacy decision. Many expect this framework to be challenged as insufficient.

Key terms - quick answers

What is “Schrems I”?
The 2015 CJEU decision striking down the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor program over U.S. surveillance concerns.
What is “Schrems II”?
The 2020 CJEU decision striking down the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield over lack of redress and proportionality in U.S. surveillance.
What is “EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework”?
The 2023 successor agreement enabling EU-to-U.S. transfers, supported by U.S. Executive Order 14086.
What is “Executive Order 14086”?
President Biden's order committing U.S. surveillance to a necessity-and-proportionality standard and creating an independent data protection review court.